Shariah Stock Emitent Efficiency Strategy in Digital Era: Application of DEA Super-Efficiency and Interpretive Structural Modeling

Aam; Irman Firmansyah

doi:10.58968/ria.v2i1.107

Authors

Aam Slamet Rusydiana SMART Indonesia
Irman Firmansyah Siliwangi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58968/ria.v2i1.107

Keywords:

Super Efficiency, Jakarta Islamic Index, ISM, DEA

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of efficiency in companies listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index today and find strategies that can be used to achieve optimal levels of efficiency through the use of digital. Analysis using DEA Super Efficiency and Interpretative Structural Modeling. The results show that companies that are consistent on JII have a greater efficiency score than companies that are not consistent, thus showing the importance of a company having an optimal level of efficiency in order to be consistently listed on JII. Based on the sample used, the average performance PT Indofood Sukses Makmur is better than other companies that are ranked in the top 5 for three consecutive years with an efficiency score of 1. In addition, efficiency results that can be said to be very good do not guarantee the company's constant conditions in terms of production of inputs and outputs in the form of RTS expected by the company. The average company experiences conditions that tend to be unstable in terms of production. So, it needs attention from management to increase input production capacity for the desired output. Information technology is one of the solutions to achieve an optimal level of efficiency, so ISM found that the best strategy is to prepare sufficient human resources and budget to use information technology in running its business, then the next strategy is to place IT in the main areas of the business so that IT can maximally used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersen, P. and Petersen, N.C. (1993), “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science, Vol. 39, pp. 1261-1264.

Al-Shammari, M. (1999). A multi-criteria data envelopment analysis model for measuring the productive efﬁciency of hospitals. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(9), 879–897

Banker, R. D., Conrad, R. F., & Strauss, R. P. (1986). A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and translog methods: An illustrative study of hospital production. Management Science, 32, 30–44

Bhattacharya, S., and Momaya, K. (2009). Interpretive Structural Modeling of Growth Enablers in Construction Companies. Singapore Management Review. ABI/INFORM Global: 73

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-44

Coelli, T.J, Rao, D.S.P., Prasada Rao, Christoper J. O’Donnel and G.E. Battese. (2005). Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, (Second Edition), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Cooper, William W, Lawrance M. Seiford and Joe Zhu. (2010). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. London: Springer.

Farrell, M.L. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, 120, p.253-281.

Firmansyah, Irman. (2019). The Role of Accountants in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Academics Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 14(2), 242-250

GIFR. (2019). Islamic Finance Country Index-IFCI 2019. DDCAP Group

Firmansyah, Irman & Nasrulloh, Agus Ahmad. (2016). Analisis Stabilitas Efisiensi dan Kinerja Asuransi Syariah dalam Menunjang Pertumbuhan IKNB Syariah. Paper, At Forum Riset Ekonomi Keuangan Syariah XIV, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Ikatan Ahli Ekonomi Islam

Gorvett, R. and Liu, N., (2007). Using interpretive structural modeling to identify and quantify interactive risks. Orlando – USA: ASTIN Colloquium.

Hadad, Y., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Sterm, Z., and Mehrez, A. (2003). Dea Super Efficiency Multistage Ranking. Computer Modelling & New Technologies, 7(1), 37-46

Lin, Tyrone T., Lee, Chia-Chi., and Chiu, Tsui-Fen. (2009). Application of DEA in analyzing a bank’s operating performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8883-8891, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.018

Maradin, Dario., Draženović, Bojana Olgić., and Benković, Slađana. (2018). Performance Evaluation Of Banking Sector By Using DEA Method. 35th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. At Lisbon, Portugal

Marimin. (2004). Pengambilan Keputusan Kreteria Majemuk. Teknik dan Aplikasi. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Jakarta.

McLeod, R. (2000). Management Information Systems. Mexico City: Prentice Hall

Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Evaluating the comparative market efﬁciency of top listed companies in Egypt. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(5), 430–452.

OJK (2019). Laporan Perkembangan Keuangan Syariah Indonesia 2018. Direktorat Pengaturan dan Perizinan Perbankan Syariah Otoritas Jasa Keuangan

Ozdemir, Asli. (2013). “Integrating analytic network process and data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement of Turkish commercial banks”. Banks and Bank Systems Volume 8 issue 2, 2013 Tsolas, Ioannis E. and Dimitris I. Giokas. (2012). “Bank branch efficiency evaluation by means of least absolute deviations and DEA”. Managerial Finance Vol 38 No. 8.

Pan, S. C., Liu, S. Y., Peng, C. J., & Wu, P. C. (2011). Local governments’ efﬁciency evaluation: Consideration of undesirable outputs and super-efﬁciency. African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4746–4754.

Reich, Blaize Horner & Benbasat, Izak. (2000). Factors that influence the Social Dimension of alignment between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81-113

Rusydiana, A. S., & Devi, A. (2013). “Challenges in Developing Baitul Maal wat Tamwiil (BMT) in Indonesia using Analytic Network Process (ANP)”. Business and Management Quarterly Review 4(2) 51-62

Rusydiana, A. S., & Marlina, L. (2019). Financial and social efficiency on indonesian Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(3), 579-602.

Rusydiana, A. S., & Nugroho, T. (2017). “Measuring efficiency of life insurance institution in Indonesia: Data envelopment analysis approach”. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp.12-24.

Rusydiana, A. S. (2019). Bagaimana mengembangkan industri fintech syariah di Indonesia? pendekatan interpretive structural model (ISM). Al-Muzara'ah, 6(2), 117-128.

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. USA: Springer

Saxena, J. P. (1992). Hierarchy and Classification of Program Plan Element Using Interpretative Structural Modelling. Systems Practice, Vol. 12 (6), P 651:670

Shahreki, Javad, Nazar Dahmardeh and Mohammad Ali Ghasemi. (2012). “Efficiency Evaluation Bank Sepah Branches in Sistan and Baluchestan Province Using Data Envelopment Analysis”. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business Vol. 4 No. 2, June 2012.

Steinmann, L., & Zweifel, P. (2003). On the (in)efﬁciency of Swiss hospitals. Applied Economics, 35(3), 361–370.

Tallon, Paul P., Kreamer, Kenneth L., and Gurbaxani, Vijay. (2000). Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach. Journal of Management Information Systems. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2000.11518269

Wu, Po-Chin., Fan, Chiung-Wen., Pan, Sheng-Chieh. (2014). Does Human Development Index Provide Rational Development Rankings? Evidence from Efﬁciency Rankings in Super Efﬁciency Model. Soc Indic Res,116, 647–658 . DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0285-z

Yawe, Bruno. (2010). Hospital Performance Evaluation in Uganda: A Super-Efficiency Data Envelope Analysis Model. Zambia Social Science Journal, 1(1), 79-105

Zelenyuk, V., & Zheka, V. (2006). Corporate governance and ﬁrm’s efﬁciency: The case of a transitional country Ukraine. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1–2), 143–157.